Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Demonetization and its Impact on the Economy:



Introduction: Govt of India has demonetized High denomination currency [Rs 500 & Rs 1000] on 9th November 2016. In this single move, the Government has attempted to tackle three major issues affecting the economy i.e. a parallel economy, counterfeit currency in circulation and terror financing. This study aims at highlighting the effect of demonetization in the economy and across various sectors.

History: Demonetization was previously implemented on Jan 1946 and again in Jan 1978. During 1946, bank notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 10,000 were withdrawn. And during 1978, bank notes of Rs 1,000, Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000 were withdrawn.
Apart from India, United States (in 1969), Sri Lanka (in 1970), Ghana (in 1982), Nigeria (in 1984), Myanmar (1987), North Korea (in 2010), Libya (in 2012) and Zimbabwe (in 2015) are some other countries that have demonetized their currency.
Considering the Socio - Economic and Political aspects, demonetization implemented in India (1978), Sri Lanka and Unites States of America were compared for the current study.

After effects of Demonetization:

Liquidity Squeeze: With demonetization, more than Rs 14.101 Lakh Crores of the Rs 16.40 Lakh Crores in circulation were frozen over night. This amounts to nearly 86% of the currency in circulation. This is significantly higher in comparison to the 11.65% and 1.75% currency demonetized in 1946 and 1978 respectively. Due to which the impact would be wider than earlier.
Though Rs 1.50 Lakh Crores have come into circulation as of 25th November, as most of the currency bought into circulation is in the form of Rs 2000 notes which are not ideal for transacting, the liquidity crunch continued.
This is expected to ease out in few months considering it would be few more months before the deficit of currency in circulation can be covered. 

Consumption: India's consumption basket is cash intensive. Value of cash transactions as a percentage of total consumer payments was approximately 86% in 2012. Though these ratios might have improved in the last few years, it is safe to assume that the share of payments in cash would still be significantly higher than in other modes.
The contraction in the cash economy, would lead to a reduced consumption demand in the short-term. This would further impact the production, employment and growth. However as liquidity is eased into the system, the same is expected to return to normalcy. This would be further aided by the use of alternative modes of payment like digital transaction systems, POS machines, E-Wallets, Apps etc.
 
Employment: As per 2009-10 census, India's employment in organised sector is only 16% against 84%2 in the unorganised sector. Though these ratios might have improved in the last 5 years, it is safe to assume that the share of employment from the unorganised sector would still be significantly higher than that from the organised sector.
The employment in the unorganised sector (mainly blue collar jobs) would be impacted in the short term. Recovery of GDP coupled with strengthed formal sector would not only increase the employment but will also improve the ratio of employement in Organised to unorganised sectors in the long term. However Govt does not take any measures to curtain the loss of employment due to demonetisation, the same might lead to a further drop in GDP.

Capital Availability: Demonetization will erase a portion of undisclosed/not-taxed money from the market. Informal lending would shrink impacting the credit flow to the small and medium players in the unorganized sectors who typically borrow from this medium. This capital erosion coupled with the liquidity crunch will affect these players in the Short - Medium term.
However as the funds available in the banking system would increase, lending to the organized sectors would improve. This excess capital with the banks would also lead to a decrease in the interest rates. 
Effect on various Sectors: Sectors where cash transactions play a vital role would have immediate negative impact. This includes sectors like Real-Estate, Construction, Jewellery, Agriculture and other informal sectors.

In Real estate, the Luxury market & secondary market (re-sale market) will be hit the worst. However the primary market might recover in the medium term after its correction, as first time buyers may enter the market .

As nearly 80% of its sales are in the unorganised market who deal mostly in cash, Jewellery segment will also be heavily impacted in the short term.

Sectors that have strong dependency on Real-estate like Cement, Steel etc will also face a negative impact in the short run. Tourism would also be impacted. Apart from the above due to the slowdown in discretionary spending, Luxury items, Automobile and consumer durables will also be effected in the short term.

GDP: GDP would have a negative impact in the short run due to liquidity crunch, reduced consumption, adverse impact on sectors dependent on the cash economy including the ones operating in unorganized segments. As captured in the chart below, the GDP growth has dived during the year when demonetization was implemented in India (1978)3, Sri lanka3 and USA3. The effect of demonetization could also be seen in the immediate years.
Though the impact of demonetization on the GDP growth of USA was evident, it was not as severe as in India and Sri lanka. India's GDP growth fell from 7.25% to -5.24% before recovering. Sri Lankan GDP growth fell from 7.72% to -0.41% before recovering. In comparison to that, USA's GDP growth fell only from 4.80% to 3.10%. As India and Sri lanka were developing economies with low exports, the impact of demonetization was severe. Poor monsoon also added to the woes of India during the period.
However as the liquidity crunch eases, consumption would improve leading GDP to the previous levels if not higher. The same could be observed in the upswing in GDP growth after 2-3 years of demonetization. 

Inflation: A drop in demand due to the contraction in cash economy would initially lead to reduced prices leading to a drop in inflation. However as the drop in production would meet the eased liquidity (after the GDP improves), the same would increase inflation to neutralize the earlier fall.

As observed from the above chart, inflation has dropped in the year of demonetization, only to increase as the GDP has improved. 

Conclusion & The Way Forward: Though there would be initial disruptions, the current move can improve the Indian economy by improving the Govt's Fiscal position, Tax revenues and tax compliance. This would improve the Govt's ability to spend on Infrastructure projects and other investments which would create employment and drive growth.

However, if no actions are taken to stop the further generation of black money, the informal segment would return to haunt sooner or later. Hence further steps needs to be taken to prevent the creation of black money in the long run. The Government should also consider introducing Polymer currency to control counterfeiting currency.

Government should conduct a digital outreach for on-boarding of the masses (especially from rural areas) to other modes of payment, there by easing the liquidity crisis in the rural areas.
Considering the increase in Tax revenues due to demonetization, Govt should to invest /increase its investment in the infrastructure projects to drive growth and create employment. The lack of which will lead to a continued downfall in GDP due to loss of employment, lower consumption and liquidity crunch.

Considering the drop in domestic demand, the Govt should help the enterprises in exporting their products. This would not only help the enterprises stay afloat but also would control the drop in employment and improve the fiscal position.

Incentives should be provided in the form of subsidised loans, tax holidays, lower tax rates to improve disposable income which would drive the consumption there by improving GDP.





Data Sources:
1: RBI | 2: GOI Census | 3: World Bank | Various news articles

Disclaimer
This note has been prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of the recipient and does not carry any right of reproduction or disclosure. Neither this note nor any of its contents may be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of Mr Chris Priyesh B.
In preparing this note, we have relied upon and assumed, without any independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from pubic sources or which was otherwise reviewed by us.
This note does not purport to contain all the information that the recipient may require. Recipients should not construe any of the contents herein as advice relating to business, financial, legal, taxation or investment matters and are advised to consult their own business, financial, legal, taxation and other advisors concerning the company.